How To Select A Financial Advisor ( Part 2 In eBook Series)

WHO’S WHO

In this book, all broker-dealers are referred to as “brokerage firms.” All financial services professionals are referred to as “financial advisors,” and to simplify for the reader, will be referred to as “he” or “him.” The term does not distinguish among retail brokers, independent brokers, investment advisors or insurance agents licensed to sell securities. “Adviser” appears only when
referencing the Investment Advisers Act of 1940.

However, industry professionals understand that retail brokers, independent brokers, and independent investment advisors operate very differently. Those crucial differences will be explained in detail in this book. Explaining those differences—in compensation, in motivation, in regulation, in expertise— is at the heart of this book. With that information, the average person can make an informed decision.

Read More

How to Select A Financial Advisor - Ed Mahaffy

FOREWORD
In 2006, Ed Mahaffy made a career-changing decision. He decided to abandon the hybrid commission and fee-based investment advice model he had followed for years to become a Fee-Only investment advisor—charging his clients based on their assets-under-management. In Ed’s mind, all individual investors must make a choice that comes down to two key questions:

• Do you wish to receive financial recommendations from a financial advisor and firm that have no fiduciary obligation, and whose recom- mendations may be influenced by commissions?

• Or would you rather pay an advisory fee for ongoing financial advice from a person and firm legally obligated to act in your best interests?

These questions seem pretty straightforward—who wouldn’t want to be guided by someone who must place their clients’ interests first and foremost? But what kind of advisor must do that?
That’s the challenge. Investors can’t answer these questions without understanding how the person who guides them is compensated. That’s a tall order when trying to figure out how the system works, what the pitfalls are, and what questions to ask.

Read More

Act 465 will significantly change the Arkansas sales and use tax exemptions available to manufacturers by phasing out two sales tax incentives while concurrently expanding the exemption for manufacturing repair parts and services. Arkansas Act 465, which was enacted on March 13, 2017, sunsets the InvestArk incentive as of June 30, 2017 and the Major Maintenance and Improvements incentive as of June 30, 2022.

Read More

TaxConnections Blogger John Dundon posts about accumulated adjustment accountsEach year, many states announce amnesty programs in an effort to incentivize taxpayers to pay state tax. Most programs, in one form or another, offer partial or full interest and penalty abatement if taxpayers pay back taxes owed. While the programs seem like a win for states in theory, as a state and local tax attorney, I can promise that such programs lead to problems. Auditors in the various states are told to close down improperly completed audits in an effort to get taxpayers in the amnesty program. This, in turn, leads to poorly conducted audits that must be protested and litigated. In short, state and local tax professionals in those states should be licking their chops for the bombardment of work that will likely ensue.

The most recent states to implement a version of an amnesty program are Arkansas, Connecticut, and Louisiana.

Arkansas’ amnesty program applies to franchise taxes and runs from September 1st through December 31st, 2013. In order to participate, taxpayers must submit all reports and forms and pay the computed tax to the state. If a taxpayer meets the requirement of the deal, then Arkansas will waive all interest and penalties for delinquent taxpayers.

Similarly, in Louisiana, a Tax Amnesty program went into effect on September 23rd, 2013. The Louisiana amnesty program is broader than Louisiana in that it covers most state and local taxes. Taxpayers only have until Read More