When the Senate overwhelmingly passed the Marketplace Fairness Act (“MFA”) (S. 743) on May 6, 2013 tax professionals and other CPAs naturally took notice. Many journalists and bloggers have taken notice, too, writing prolifically about the so-called “Internet sales tax.” This is the closest such legislation has come to being enacted, and so naturally it is newsworthy. However, many in their excitement have begun talking about the passage of this Act as if it is a foregone conclusion. So far the MFA has passed the Senate. But some say it has a tough road ahead in the House and that it may even be dead-on-arrival in the Republican-controlled House.

Will it pass? We don’t know and can’t predict. The only thing we can be sure of is that whether the MFA passes or not, sales tax nexus is and will continue to be a very relevant, complex issue demanding attention by businesses large and small and their CPAs.

False Belief Number One: If The Marketplace Fairness Act Passes, Everyone Will Have Nexus Everywhere. Nexus Will Be Obsolete.

We are actually hearing this statement in one form or another from many CPAs and other professionals. While we could agree that the physical presence aspect of nexus has been under pressure since the Quill case and that the pressure appears to be increasing every year, we can not agree that nexus would be obsolete. The MFA still has many questions that need to be answered. For example, if the MFA does pass in the House, what modifications will be made and what will the final version look like? Will all the states participate? What will be the minimum threshold? Read More

Phil Mickelson has been roundly castigated for daring to comment on the amount of taxes he pays. He calculates it at 63 percent. Others have said that he really only pays 53 percent (btw, I note that KPMG is his sponsor — couldn’t they tell him what percent of tax he pays?). Others say he should stop the “whining.” Apparently, it got so bad, he felt he had to issue an apology.

Where have we come to as a country that a person can’t complain that more than 50 percent of his income is skimmed by the government?

How Much Is Too Much?

Let’s go with 53 percent as the correct number. That’s just the tax on income. It doesn’t take into account sales taxes, property taxes, fuels taxes, and the list goes on. How much is too much? And what about the “tax” imposed on individuals and companies that must hire accountants (like PJCo) just to help them navigate the complicated tax world. It’s really getting to be ridiculous.

Federal taxes account for the biggest bite when it comes to income taxes. But state income taxes are a significant part of the overall income tax picture. And it’s not all about rates either. State income taxes present a much bigger level of complexity than the federal. Individuals and businesses have to also figure out where they should be filing tax returns. They may have nexus in another state by virtue of their own travels or by employee activities or even by Read More

Google is one of the biggest collection of companies in the world. Wisely, Google has divided itself into many companies to deal with the different tax laws not only in the Fifty United States but in dealing with worldwide taxes. By using proper tax planning, Google is effectively avoiding taxes in many countries.

In order to be subject to taxation in a given country, a business must have “Nexus” in that country. The word Nexus comes from the same root as “connection”. Typically that means a company must have an actual physical presence in the country.

Google has been very wise in its tax planning. It has its main business in Bermuda, a low tax country, and in the Republic of Ireland, also a low tax country. Google has set up a separate entity in the United Kingdom as a “technology and marketing” company. The idea is that technical services are performed by the UK subsidiary as well Read More

by Andrew Johnson

In today’s economy, people are looking for ways to make more money. Maybe working from home is the way to go? One opportunity is to sell products online as a drop shipper. The way it is pitched goes like this: It’s easy; no upfront investment in inventory; it’s convenient and efficient; you can do it anywhere (like Hawaii?); etc. Building a drop shipping empire sure sounds great, but what are the downsides?

When it comes to evaluating the drop shipping opportunity, there are some significant downsides to consider. The first three are downsides that others have mentioned, but the fourth one never seems to come up, and it could be the most costly of all. First downside: competition is fierce, so margins are low; second, you could be selling something that the manufacturer no longer has in stock, which can cause you headaches; and third, because you never see the product, how well are you going to be able to describe and sell it? The fourth downside is a potential deal-killer — sales tax. Is sales tax due on what you sell, and if so, who is supposed to collect it? If you, the seller, are required to collect the sales tax and you don’t, you could be facing the biggest tragedy in sales tax. At the very least, your business could be wiped out by assessed taxes, penalties, and interest. At the worst, the business owner could face personal penalties.

Why Worry About Sales Tax? Online Sales Are Not Taxed (Right?)

A common misconception is that goods sold over the internet are not taxable. This is simply not true. The fact is that most tangible items sold online are taxable in most states. The question is whether you the seller are required to collect that tax. The answer to that question is not so easy to determine, unfortunately. It comes down to how connected the seller is to the state they are shipping to. We call this “nexus.” If you are sufficiently connected to your customer’s ship-to state, then you have nexus with that state and they can force you to collect their taxes, even though you are selling online.

It All Comes Down To Nexus

So what activities create nexus for sellers? See this list of 10 Common Nexus-Creating Activities for Sales Tax. If you conduct any of these activities in any other state, you could be forced to start collecting tax there. Also, see this other list of 10 Other Nexus-Creating Activities that vary by state.

Those are activities that create nexus for any type of business. But it’s not that easy for online sellers who do drop-shipping exclusively because they are unique. They don’t typically have any real property (such as warehouses, offices, etc.), nor do they own inventory, nor do they have employees, nor even sales reps in other states. So maybe there’s nothing to worry about. But one thing that might trip up an online seller could be the services your supplier might be performing for you. Consider these situations and whether they could give you nexus:

•  The manufacturer acts as a fulfillment agent packing and shipping the products in the final customer’s state. That doesn’t seem fair. It’s one of the main upsides of selling online and using drop-shipping in the first place. The idea is that you would outsource all of that hassle of packing and shipping to someone else. The problem is that several states say those activities create nexus for you the seller. Get the chart here.

•  The manufacturer accepts and processes returns? That’s another of the main benefits of doing business this way — you don’t have to handle returns. Many states say this also creates nexus for you in their state. Get the chart here.

Maybe after reviewing the lists above and consulting your advisor, you determine that you do not have nexus in any other state (of course you realize you would have a tax collection responsibility at least on shipments to customers in your home state). Good for you, that’s a load off your shoulders! But, as a drop shipping mogul, you know not to let your guard down! State governments are always looking to expand the rules so that more and more online sellers will be drawn into their net, so keep an eye out for those changes. But there’s another potentially more costly sales tax problem to watch out for.

Other Sales Tax Issues That Could Kill Your Profit Margin

Imagine the following scenario. You find your niche products. Your marketing prowess has customers flocking to your online listings, and products fly off the virtual shelves. Shipments go out. The money rolls in. The customers are happy; you’re ecstatic. According to your calculations, based on the suppliers’ prices to you, you’re going to make a handsome 8 percent profit margin. Beautiful! Except for one small detail…

When the charge from your supplier hits your credit card you see that they have charged you sales tax of 10 percent. Not only is your profit wiped out, but you’re in the hole and the hole is getting deeper with every new sale. Is this possible? Is it correct? How can this be?

It All Comes Down To Nexus For The Supplier, Too

It sounds like a nightmare come true, but this scenario is not uncommon. The reason is the same as we discussed earlier. It has to do with the manufacturers and distributors of the products you are selling and where they have nexus. If they have nexus in the state where your customer resides, then they may be forced to charge you, the seller, sales tax on those shipments. And this is where it gets really complicated — and potentially costly to you. Because, depending on the states involved, the manufacturer/distributor may have no choice but to charge you sales tax on a product you are shipping to a customer in another state. Even though you are simply reselling those items to another person. Sales tax can range from 5 to 10 percent.

And to add insult to injury: Depending on the states involved, the manufacturer may be required to charge you the sales tax not on their price to you, the seller, but on the estimated final sales price to your customer.

Now that is a tragedy!

This is a complicated area of sales tax. We have some charts that may be of interest to you as the seller in a drop-ship situation. Also, the situation is further complicated if there are additional middlemen involved between the manufacturer and the seller and the final customer.

•  If the manufacturer is registered in the final customer’s state, but the seller is not, is the manufacturer required to collect tax on its sale to the seller? Get the chart here.

•  If the manufacturer is required to collect the tax, what is the basis of the tax? The sales price to the seller or the sales price to the final customer or some other value? Get the chart here.

•  Can the seller avoid the tax by giving the manufacturer/distributor a resale certificate from the seller’s home state? There’s no simple chart for this because there are lots of complicating factors in the resale certificate area. For example, what if you as a seller operate out of Oregon or other non-sales tax state? Also, what other documentation could the manufacturer accept in order not to charge the seller tax?

•  What if the final customer is a school, church, hospital, etc. that is a non-taxable entity in their state? They don’t pay sales tax by virtue of the exemption they are given, but the manufacturer could still be required to charge you sales tax. Get the chart here.

Nobody likes to be the wet blanket on another’s enthusiasm fire as they begin new business ventures. So please don’t kill the messenger. It’s better to be aware of the potential pitfalls in advance so you can take steps to minimize the damage and your new business can thrive. In the final analysis, there’s probably no way to make money easily and legally with no risk from home. Selling products online using drop-shipping suppliers sure seems like it could be easy, and there’s no doubt it’s legal, but beware of the sales tax consequences and avoid the trap of paying the tax yourself years later. Know the pitfalls to avoid, and you can build your own empire with confidence.

By Michael J. Fleming

One of my mentors constantly reminds me that, “We are accountants; words have meaning.” My immediate response is to usually think that, “if we were not accountants would words not have meaning?” However, once I get past my sarcastic thoughts, I realize that he is challenging us to be more precise and succinct in our writing and to not just read surface meanings but to really analyze the words for alternative meanings. Looking for alternative meanings is especially important when it comes to state tax audit defense. Since you can’t change the facts, you sometimes have to change the argument.

This concept was illustrated quite pointedly in the recent decision of Van Horn v. Alabama Department of Revenue, Alabama Department of Revenue, Administrative Law Division, No. S. 12-863, January 3, 2013. In this case, the taxpayer or his employees traveled throughout AL to take photographs which were later developed at the home office and sent to customers by common carrier. The taxpayer also made in-person phone calls. The DOR examiner assessed the taxpayer for the local taxes based on the sales and photographing visits. The administrative law judge agreed that it could be argued that the taxpayer had purposely availed himself of the economic market and met the conditions of Quill. However, Quill did not apply because the DOR had not updated its regulations concerning local nexus. Basically the only activity that mattered was solicitation and the taxpayer actually traveled into four jurisdictions to solicit sales. However the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that this was still not enough to create nexus. His reasoning was that the statute read “salesmen” while in the taxpayer’s case there was only one “salesman”. He clarified that since the state only used the plural form, the regulation anticipated multiple sales people and therefore the taxpayer did not have nexus.

Words have meaning! In this case the state failed to update its language to be more encompassing and capture the implications of Quill as well as using only the plural form of a word. What great illustrations! We don’t suggest taking this approach when doing tax planning but when you find yourself in an audit situation having someone who can think outside the box is invaluable. My mentor constantly forces us to do so.

We know that a physical presence in a state can create sales tax nexus (per Quill decision).  When does that nexus end?  What if you had a sales office and then closed it?  What about income tax nexus?

Some state laws specifically say that nexus can continue even after it looks like it ended. This is called “trailing nexus.”  It seems odd.  But, perhaps if you close your office and continue to fulfill orders from catalogs people picked up in your store when it was open or have a coupon you gave them that expires after you left the state, it makes some sense. Maybe.

For more, see my 21st Century Taxation blog post with some links – http://21stcenturytaxation.blogspot.com/2012/12/trailing-nexus-constitutional.html.

Have you had an auditor raise this issue?  How do you advise clients as to when nexus ends?