What Was The IRS’ Beef With Captives? –

Starting in the mid-1970s, and continuing through the UPS case, the IRS fought captives tooth and nail. Over the course of these cases, they advanced three different legal arguments against captive insurance: the economic family argument, the nexus of contracts and the assignment of income doctrine.

However, it’s important to ask this question regarding the IRS’ legal battle: “what was it about captives that the IRS didn’t like?” To answer that question, we need to go back to a series of cases from the early 20th century called the reserve cases. In all of these cases, a taxpayer foresaw a particular adverse event and started to place money into a reserve fund in Read More

The current tax rules underpinning practically every tax code around the globe are derived from a “bricks and mortar” or manufacturing based economy. What this means is the underlying concepts were developed when all world economies were based on building physical products that were bought and sold (think industrial revolution). For example, the tax treaty phrase “permanent establishment” was actually developed by League of Nation’s negotiators during their preliminary discussions to develop a working tax treaty framework. Compare this to today’s digital economy where “products” are actually multiple lines of computer code that exist in cyber-space (or a trademark or patented item) or where a “store front” (the old “permanent establishment”) is in fact a web site located halfway around the globe on a server in a tax haven. This mismatch between the underlying concepts of the old Read More

Senate Finance Committee chairman Max Baucus, D-Montana, has released the first in a series of discussion drafts for overhauling the Tax Code, with the first set of proposals focusing on international tax reform.

The proposal details ideas on how to reform international tax rules to spark economic growth, create jobs and make United States businesses more competitive.

Additional tax reform discussion drafts will be released later this week.

Baucus and his counterpart in the House, Rep. Dave Camp, R-Michigan, chairman of the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, have committed to drafting comprehensive Read More

VATThere is a global trend toward increasing VAT rates and broadening the grounds for charging VAT. Governments increase their tax revenues in this way as a means of combating increasing budget shortages due to the financial crisis and/or for financing the reduction of direct taxes (corporate tax, income tax, etc.).

Numerous multinational companies use very many different tax codes and risk facing a “shortage” of necessary tax codes. Companies face bottlenecks with SAP‘s 2 character tax codes and the many necessary modifications in SAP in the event of VAT rate changes.

It seems therefore a straightforward matter, however in practice a considerable amount of activities are required to get this properly implemented in SAP.

The reason is that VAT codes in SAP are not set-up with validity dates and therefore for every VAT rate change a new VAT code has to be created. Due to the complexity in SAP, the creation of a new code is just the starting point to get SAP up and running.

Below you find a non-exhaustive list of required activities in case of VAT rate changes. It depends on the current configuration of VAT functionality whether all activities listed below are required. The opposite is also possible that more activities are necessary. Read More

The New York Times Editorial Board has written an editorial condemning tax breaks, which is justified, in part. They point out:

Tax breaks work like spending. Giving a deduction for certain activities, like homeownership or retirement savings, is the same as writing a government check to subsidize those activities. Functionally, they mimic entitlements. Like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security, they are available, year in and year out, in full, to all who qualify. Yet in budget talks, Republicans ignore tax entitlements, which flow mostly to high-income taxpayers, while pushing to cut Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

While they point out that the deduction for homeownership is the same as writing a government check they go on and only point out the special deductions/entitlements they feel are the ones the rich take advantage of:

CARRIED INTEREST.   This loophole lets private equity partners pay tax on most of their income at a top rate of 20 percent, versus a top rate of 39.6 percent for other high-income professionals. It drains the Treasury of $13.4 billion a decade, and should be closed, along with a shelter recently enacted in Puerto Rico that would help shield the income of individuals whose taxes would rise if the carried-interest tax break was eliminated.

NINE-FIGURE I.R.A.’S.   Remember Mitt Romney’s $100 million I.R.A? Private equity partners apparently build up vast tax-deferred accounts by claiming that the equity interests transferred to such accounts from, say, their firms’ buyout targets are not worth much. No one knows how much tax is avoided this way. What is known is that I.R.A.’s are meant to help build retirement nest eggs, not to help amass huge estates to pass on to heirs.

‘LIKE KIND’ EXCHANGES.   As reported in The Times by David Kocieniewski, this tax break was enacted some 90 years ago to help farmers sell land and horses without owing tax, as long as they used the proceeds to buy new farm assets. Today, it is used by wealthy individuals and big companies to avoid tax on the sale of art, vacation homes, rental properties, oil wells, commercial real estate and thoroughbred horses, among other transactions. Government estimates say this costs about $3 billion a year, but industry data suggest the amount could be far higher.

While these entitlements, which can be abused egregiously,  they are not the only ones. What Congress really needs to do is discard the entire tax code except for §61 which defines income as:

Except as otherwise provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income from whatever source derived …

Starting with that clean slate they should only allow exceptions for those exceptions which are willfully, intelligently and fully understood when put in place. No passing them so we can read the bill later.

These exceptions to income should be subject to hard and fast sunset provisions with the continuing of the exceptions only after detailed review and assessment that the purpose for which it was provided still is valid.

The tax code should not be used for social policy reasons. Examples are numerous but some of them are:

1.  Education Credits – to promote higher education for a certain group of citizens … discrimination to “fix” discrimination.

2.  Earned Income Credit – the largest area of fraudulent returns.

3.  Child tax credits … paying people who cannot afford to have children to have children.

4.  Mortgage Interest Deduction … started with the tax code of 1952 to help enable the returning veterans buy homes … something Congress deemed a good social goal.

5.  Child Care Credit … to allow single mothers the ability to work … a worthy cause I am sure but one that does little to discourage out of wedlock children, single parent homes, latch-key children, the cycle of children who are brought up thinking this sort of life style is appropriate.

Some will think I am harsh by the entitlements that I point out. I am not trying to say that none of them are valid I am just arguing that there should be no sacred cows. No matter which section of the tax code you try to eliminate someone’s ox is being gored. It is time to start over with the clean slate.