Access Leading Tax Experts And Technology
In Our Global Digital Marketplace

Please enter your input in search

Is It Better To Start A New Business Or Relocate An Existing One Into An OZ?

start a new business or relocate an existing one into an OZ

As we enter into the third year of the federal Qualified Opportunity Zone (QOZ) program we have a slightly clearer picture of how taxpayers are using this flexible and impactful program.

Not surprisingly, the vast majority of early Qualified Opportunity Funds (QOFs) formed through Dec. 31, 2019 are focused on real estate projects as they begin directing their investments into Qualified Opportunity Zone Businesses (QOZBs). Preliminary reports in 2019 indicated that only about 5% of public QOFs were focused on operating businesses. However as the Treasury Department provided more guidance through new sets of proposed and final regulations, taxpayers and the OZ community have come to realize that using the OZ program for operating businesses can yield even greater long-term benefits for both OZ communities and investors compared to real estate projects alone.


To participate in the QOZ program, the taxpayer must generally roll all or a portion of their short-term or long-term capital gain into a QOF within 180 days of the taxpayer being required to report the tax gain. The Final Regulations further liberalized when the 180-day period begins for various types of gains and the entity type generating the gains. The QOF must invest the deferred gains into undeveloped or developed real estate, a new or existing QOZB, or directly into other qualified QOZ Business Property (QOZBP).

Effective Jan. 1, 2018 through Dec. 31, 2026, Individuals, C and S Corporations, REIT’s, partnerships and other pass-through entities can sell their appreciated capital assets and elect to reinvest the resulting capital gain income into a QOF, in order to defer the tax on those gains for up to seven years (Dec. 31, 2026 when the deferred gain is reported) and also permanently exempt up to 15% of the original federal gain (after 7 years) and 100% of the post-reinvestment gain (after holding the QOF interest for at least 10 years). [1] QOF’s established after 2019 will not meet the seven-year holding period by Dec. 31, 2026 and will therefore only receive a 10% tax basis step-up. It is also worth noting that taxpayers residing or investing in certain states, including: California, Mississippi. Massachusetts (non-corporate taxpayers) and North Carolina must factor in their state tax exposure due to non-conformity with the federal OZ rules. Where possible, Section 1031 transactions may be preferable, or installment sales, with an election out of installment sale treatment for federal purposes to allow OZ reinvestment for federal and for state an installment sale deferral.


From the OZ investor perspective, operating business investments offer benefits above those available to OZ real estate investments, including the following: less entitlements, less capital outlay, arguably less risk, quicker path to revenue generation, ability to alter business plan, mobility and often a higher multiple upon exit.

As a result, serial entrepreneurs and investors with connections to successful business operators should consider operating businesses as a highly attractive OZ business investment.

While the initial OZ statute and first set of Treasury Regulations focused primarily on real estate projects as re-investment options, the second set and final regulations certainly clarified that operating businesses are appropriate re-investments for deferred gain. The regulations also provided more liberal reinvestment periods and other more flexible provisions as compared to real estate projects.

Let’s analyze the various ways an OZ investor might acquire an operating business. We will compare the three general ways for qualifying a business under the OZ rules in order of easiest to most complex.

Keep in mind the core requirements for a business to qualify as a QOZB:

1) At least 70% of the QOZB’s assets must be QOZBP [2] primarily used in OZ census tracts [3]

2) At least 40% of all QOZB intangibles must be used in OZ census tracts [4]

3) At least 50% of the QOZB income must be OZ-sourced income, determined under a three “safe harbor” set of rules, or an alternative facts-and-circumstance test, contained in the second set of regulations. [5]

There is no minimum amount required to invest in an operating business, and taxpayers can invest both qualified deferred gain and after-tax money into the business; however, only the qualified deferred gains invested into the QOF/ QOZB are eligible for the various OZ tax benefits.


Establishing a new business (or starting a new division which offers a new product or service) within a single or multiple OZ census tracts is the most straightforward way to qualify an operating business under the code and regulations.

The reason that a new start-up business is the cleanest way to meet the OZ qualifications is that the tangible property acquired for use in the new business will generally be treated as QOZBP unless the property had been used in an OZ census tract before acquisition or was acquired from a Related Party (over 20% common ownership).

Leased assets, even if acquired from a related party, are treated as first used by the acquiring taxpayer, however, special Related Party lease rules (which are much less onerous than the Related Party rules applicable to purchased assets) must be followed to ensure QOZBP classification. [6]

Another possible method for getting assets into a new business is for the QOF investor to contribute qualifying assets into the QOF, in which case the Related Party rules are not applicable. The downside of a contribution of assets (in lieu of cash) to a QOF is that no eligible gain is triggered for OZ reinvestment and the contributing taxpayer’s eligible QOF reinvestment is limited to the lower of their tax basis in the property contributed or the fair market value. The difference between fair market value and tax basis creates a “Mixed Fund”.[7] The secondary problem is that the contributed asset is not treated as QOZBP since it was not “purchased” after 2017.

In virtually all cases, the operating business will be owned by the QOZB rather than the QOF. This is to allow the operating business to obtain the favorable general 31-month or the newly introduced 62-month “start-up” business Working Capital Safe Harbor[8], and also secure the more liberal 70% QOZBP requirement vs. the more stringent 90% requirement for QOF’s. This means the QOZB can hold up to 30% non-QOZBP – or “bad assets” without subjecting the QOF to penalties for failing the semi-annual qualification testing. [9]


Moving an existing business into an OZ census tract can offer a number of complexities, but with proper planning it can be done.

If the business is owned by more than 20% of the QOF equity owners, then the assets brought into the QOF or QOZB will be non-QOZBP. This is not fatal to qualifying the business provided the investors plan on investing material amounts into the transferred business.

For example if the QOZB acquires business assets not previously used in an OZ census tract from a related party for $500,000, such assets are non-QOZBP, but provided this amount remains less than 30% of total QOZB assets, the QOZB can still meet the qualification tests. Therefore, provided the QOZB has at least $1,666,667 of total assets ($500,000/ 30%), then the QOZB will meet the qualification test – provided all other assets are QOZBP.

If the assets are acquired from a third-party, and if the QOZB doubles the basis in the assets acquired within 30 months then the QOZB will be treated as the “original user” and all the acquired assets will generally be treated as QOZBP and the total minimum investment (e.g. $1 million to double basis) can be minimized as compared to the Related Party acquisition.

It is also worth noting that the preamble to the Final Regulations confirms that preexisting entities are not barred from qualifying as QOFs or QOZBs. Like newly formed partnerships and corporations, however, these preexisting entities must satisfy all requirements applicable to IRC Section 1400Z-2 and related regulations.


In a case where an existing business was operating within an OZ census tract prior to 2018, all of the operating assets of the business are treated as ineligible and non-QOZBP since they had been used in the OZ before acquisition. As a result, an existing entity with $500,000 of net tangible assets will only qualify as a QOZB if it makes significant investments sufficient to drive down the non-QOZBP assets below 30%. Similar to the calculation in example 2 above, the QOF/ QOZB must be willing to invest at least 234% of additional funds ([$1,666,667 – $500,000]/ $500,000) into the business in order to dilute the $500,000 of non-QOZBP/ “bad assets” below 30%.

Similar investments will be required whether the existing business attempts to qualify itself as an OZ business for a third-party acquisition by making the additional expansion investment or whether the business sells its equity to a QOF or assets to a QOZB before the additional cash infusion, the new owner must invest at least 2.34 times/ 234% more into the business to meet the 70% for at least the 31- or 62-month Working Capital Safe Harbor period.


The various basis step-ups and ultimate gain exemption parallel the rules for real estate projects. The qualified gain re-investment made via equity investments into the QOF will obtain the 10% (5 year) and 5% (7 year) step ups and then the total exemption after holding the fund or underlying assets for at least 10 years from the date of QOF investment.

Therefore, assuming a total equity investment of $2 million in the examples above (rounded up for illustration) and the company is sold after 10 years for $20 million – the full $18 million is tax exempt for federal and most states – even though this may represent hard asset appreciation as well as intellectual property/ goodwill appreciation, whether purchased or developed internally.


Under the OZ statute, a QOF must be either a corporation (C, S or REIT) or a partnership. Disregarded entities and other legal formats are not allowed.[10] The vast majority of QOF’s and QOZB are established as either limited partnerships or LLC’s taxed as partnerships. The reason being that corporations are highly inefficient tax entities for holding appreciating assets.

Another key factor regarding entity choice is that QOF investors receive no tax basis in their QOF investment until: i) taxable gain is reportable by the entity, ii) additional non-deferred gains are contributed to the QOF, or iii) loans are secured by partnerships (or S Corps securing loans directly from shareholders). C and S Corps are not generally allowed to revalue their assets when equity interests are transferred whereas partnerships can make such “inside” basis adjustments under IRC Sections 734 and 743.

As a result, LLC/ partnerships are generally the entity of choice for QOF’s and QOZB’s.

Even so, there are certain situations that call for a C Corp structure for the QOZB where the entity meets the requirements of IRC Section 1202 – Qualified Small Business Stock. Certain industries, including most service businesses) are precluded from qualifying for this classification.[11] The QOZB can start off as a partnership but will want to convert to a C Corp prior to reaching a value of $50 million. The significant benefit of qualifying under the 1202 provisions is that the QOF can sell the QOZB shares after holding the C Corp stock at least five years, and exclude for federal (and most states) the smaller of $10 million per taxpayer or 10 times their qualified investment for federal tax purposes.[12] This effectively provides the QOF investor to exit the QOZB investment in five years rather than the full 10 year and still get a very substantial tax-free return. While most states conform, not all do – in particular California.


Another advantage of using the OZ program for operating businesses is that additional federal and state tax incentives, including various hiring and equipment tax credits, grants, exemptions and other benefits are available to the QOZB, QOF and/ or equity holders.

Want To Learn More About The OZ Program?

Request Series Of OZ Program?

TaxConnections Suggests You Request All Articles Written By Expert Blake Christian At This Link.


[1] IRC Sec. 1400Z-2(b)

[2] IRC Sec. 1400Z-2(d)(3)(A)(i)

[3] IRC Sec. 1400Z-2(d)(2)(D)(i)(III)

[4] IRC Sec. 1400Z-2(d)(3)(A)(ii)

[5] Treasury Reg. Sec. 1.1400Z2(d)-1(d)(3)

[6] Treasury Reg. Sec. 1.1400Z2(d)-2(c)(3)

[7] Treasury Reg. Sec. 1.1400Z2(a)-1(b)(15) or Treasury Reg. Sec. 1400Z2(a)-1(c)(6)(ii)(B)

[8] Treasury Reg. Sec. 1.1400Z2(d)-2(a)(2)

[9] Treasury Reg. Sec. 1.1400Z2(d)-1

[10] Treasury Reg. Sec. 1.1400Z2(d)-1(a)(1)

[11] IRC Section 1202(e)(3)

[12] IRC Section 1202(b)(1)


Blake is a nationally recognized expert and frequent author and speaker on State and Federal Location-based Incentive Credits (LBIC’s), including State Enterprise Zone Credits, Federal Empowerment, Renewal Community, Indian Tribal Lands and Gulf Opportunity Zone Credits. He has also assisted in the development of specialized software, which is used by over 200 tax departments throughout the U.S. to identify LBIC’s. Blake’s clients include multi-national, publicly traded corporations, as well as closely held owner-managed businesses. His industry concentration includes manufacturing and distribution, service companies, restaurant, shipping and transportation, energy and healthcare. In addition to corporate, partnership and individual tax compliance and planning, Blake is experienced in the design and implementation of executive compensation plans.

Twitter LinkedIn 

Leave a Reply