
The United States is tracking down hidden offshore accounts, and the latest news is a report that shows which states have the most taxpayers disclosing such accounts (California is No. 1), and where they are located (Switzerland is tops).
Taxpayers in at least 45 states and the District of Columbia reported accounts in 68 countries and territories.
The new U.S. Government Accountability Office report: “IRS’s Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program (OVDP): 2009 Participation by State and Location of Foreign Bank Accounts,” is a supplement to its March 2013 report, “Offshore Tax Evasion: IRS Has Collected Billions of Dollars, but May be Missing Continued Evasion.”
In the new report, the GAO looked at 10,500 tax returns for 2008 filed by 2009 disclosure participants, and the 12,889 accompanying FBAR forms. Some taxpayers disclosed dozens of offshore accounts with multiple banks and in multiple countries; some disclosed just one account in one country.
Table 1: 2009 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program Participants by State 2008 tax return mailing address
Table 1: 2009 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program Participants by State 2008 tax return mailing address
|
Frequency
|
Percent
|
Alabama
|
26
|
<1%
|
Alaska
|
20
|
<1%
|
Arizona
|
146
|
1%
|
Arkansas
|
17
|
<1%
|
California
|
2,524
|
24%
|
Colorado
|
139
|
1%
|
Connecticut
|
210
|
2%
|
Delaware
|
17
|
<1%
|
District of Columbiaa
|
49
|
<1%
|
Florida
|
1,022
|
10%
|
Georgia
|
143
|
1%
|
Hawaii
|
59
|
1%
|
Idaho
|
11
|
<1%
|
Illinois
|
291
|
3%
|
Indiana
|
47
|
<1%
|
Iowa
|
17
|
<1%
|
Kansas
|
22
|
<1%
|
Kentucky
|
24
|
<1%
|
Louisiana
|
39
|
<1%
|
Maine
|
25
|
<1%
|
Maryland
|
203
|
2%
|
Massachusetts
|
307
|
3%
|
Michigan
|
129
|
1%
|
Minnesota
|
59
|
1%
|
Mississippi
|
11
|
<1%
|
Missouri
|
57
|
1%
|
Montanab
|
—
|
—
|
Nebraska
|
11
|
<1%
|
Nevada
|
97
|
1%
|
New Hampshire
|
40
|
<1%
|
New Jersey
|
631
|
6%
|
New Mexico
|
31
|
<1%
|
New York
|
1,844
|
18%
|
North Carolina
|
125
|
1%
|
North Dakotab
|
—
|
—
|
Ohio
|
159
|
2%
|
Oklahoma
|
17
|
<1%
|
Oregon
|
58
|
1%
|
Pennsylvania
|
269
|
3%
|
Rhode Island
|
25
|
<1%
|
South Carolina
|
50
|
<1%
|
South Dakotab
|
—
|
—
|
Tennessee
|
48
|
<1%
|
Texas
|
512
|
5%
|
Utah
|
26
|
<1%
|
Vermont
|
26
|
<1%
|
Virginia
|
184
|
2%
|
Washington
|
231
|
2%
|
West Virginiab
|
—
|
—
|
Wisconsin
|
49
|
<1%
|
Wyomingb
|
—
|
—
|
Subtotal of suppressed states b
|
29
|
<1%
|
Other addresses a,c
|
457
|
4%
|
TOTAL
|
10,533
|
100%
|
2: Locations of Foreign Bank Accounts Reported on Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) Forms by 2009 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program Participants Country or territory
2: Locations of Foreign Bank Accounts Reported on Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) Forms by 2009 Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program Participants Country or territory
|
Frequency
|
Percent a
|
Switzerland
|
5,427
|
42%
|
United Kingdom
|
1,058
|
8%
|
Canada
|
556
|
4%
|
France
|
528
|
4%
|
Israel
|
510
|
4%
|
Germany
|
484
|
4%
|
China
|
394
|
3%
|
Hong Kong
|
362
|
3%
|
Taiwan
|
307
|
2%
|
India
|
306
|
2%
|
Italy
|
189
|
1%
|
Luxembourg
|
174
|
1%
|
Australia
|
161
|
1%
|
Singapore
|
156
|
1%
|
Cayman Islands
|
148
|
1%
|
Liechtenstein
|
142
|
1%
|
Netherlands
|
121
|
1%
|
Austria
|
116
|
1%
|
Ireland
|
110
|
1%
|
Sweden
|
107
|
1%
|
Belgium
|
106
|
1%
|
Mexico
|
102
|
1%
|
Isle of Man (UK)
|
90
|
1%
|
South Korea
|
86
|
1%
|
Japan
|
83
|
1%
|
Spain
|
82
|
1%
|
South Africa
|
81
|
1%
|
Jersey (UK)
|
72
|
1%
|
New Zealand
|
72
|
1%
|
Bahamas
|
69
|
1%
|
Brazil
|
59
|
<1%
|
Thailand
|
54
|
<1%
|
Bermuda
|
52
|
<1%
|
Denmark
|
52
|
<1%
|
Norway
|
50
|
<1%
|
Greece
|
49
|
<1%
|
Virgin Islands (British)
|
49
|
<1%
|
Monaco
|
45
|
<1%
|
Panama
|
44
|
<1%
|
Philippines
|
39
|
<1%
|
Costa Rica
|
33
|
<1%
|
Netherlands (Antilles)
|
32
|
<1%
|
Colombia
|
29
|
<1%
|
Turkey
|
29
|
<1%
|
Guernsey
|
26
|
<1%
|
Hungary
|
25
|
<1%
|
Malaysia
|
25
|
<1%
|
United Arab Emirates
|
22
|
<1%
|
Jamaica
|
20
|
<1%
|
Dominican Republic
|
18
|
<1%
|
Lebanon
|
18
|
<1%
|
Poland
|
18
|
<1%
|
Venezuela
|
18
|
<1%
|
Chile
|
15
|
<1%
|
Cyprus
|
15
|
<1%
|
Finland
|
15
|
<1%
|
Antigua & Barbuda
|
14
|
<1%
|
Argentina
|
14
|
<1%
|
Iran
|
14
|
<1%
|
Portugal
|
14
|
<1%
|
Russia
|
14
|
<1%
|
Egypt
|
13
|
<1%
|
Uruguay
|
13
|
<1%
|
Sri Lanka
|
12
|
<1%
|
Guatemala
|
12
|
<1%
|
Czech Republic
|
11
|
<1%
|
Pakistan
|
11
|
<1%
|
Saint Kitts & Nevis
|
10
|
<1%
|
The 58 other countries and territories included had 1% or less of the total number of foreign bank accounts reported. Offshore tax evasion continues to be a hot issue in Washington. The IRS included “hiding income offshore” on its dirty dozen list of tax scams for 2014, touting the voluntary disclosure program and warning: “It is in the best long-term interest of taxpayers to come forward, catch up on their filing requirements and pay their fair share.” The Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations will hold a hearing on February 26, “Offshore Tax Evasion: The Effort to Collect Unpaid Taxes on Billions in Hidden Offshore Accounts.”
At the same time, the National Taxpayer Advocate, Nina Olson, in her January annual report to Congress, points out the impact of the disclosure programs on taxpayers who make honest mistakes as one of the most serious problems encountered by taxpayers.
In accordance with Circular 230 Disclosure
4 comments on “The United States Knows Where Offshore Tax Evaders Live And Bank!”
It would appear that Canada ranks high as a tax haven.
No assumption of guilt should be made. OVDP doesn’t differentiate between home landers with hidden offshore accounts and non-residents who have accounts in their country of residence. The U.S. definition of “offshore” is completely self serving as is the U.S. definition of who is a U.S. person. U.S. tax law makes it impossible for a non-resident to have an onshore account because U.S. tax law forbids U.S. persons from living abroad.
Of course some people may say that isn’t true. But imagine if the U.S. government required a non-resident to buy your food from only U.S. government approved stores. Or denied a non-resident the right to have access to medical care that is not available in the U.S. or that isn’t covered by Medicaid or Medicare. Regardless of the fact that the U.S. government doesn’t fund the service.
The true numbers need to account for only those who live within U.S. territory and have sent funds overseas that haven’t been reported. OVDP, FATCA and citizenship based taxation are GREAT HUMAN RIGHTS tragedies that only the U.S. could flagrantly and unashamedly practise. When it was the Russians, Chinese or the Nazis who were oppressing their people in similar ways the U.S. was on the side of the angels. My how the cards have turned.
Well well- Switzerland is number one because Delaware, Wyoming, Nevada were not included in the survey!
Comments are closed.