The Wayfair Case | TaxConnections

Access Leading Tax Experts And Technology
In Our Global Digital Marketplace

Unravelling The Impact: How The Wayfair Case Sales Tax Legislation Has Shaped The Ecommerce Landscape

In e-commerce, where digital marketplaces transcend geographical boundaries, ongoing sales tax legislation in states across the country has emerged as a crucial factor for the success and sustainability of online businesses. With governments around the globe recognizing the immense economic potential of e-commerce, the introduction of sales tax regulations here in the US has become a pressing reality. In the wake of the Wayfair case, compliance with these legislative measures has now become paramount for e-commerce businesses, as failure to adhere to the evolving tax landscape can result in significant financial consequences and reputational damage.

In this article, we explore the intricate implications of sales tax legislation on e-commerce businesses, shedding light on the challenges they face and the strategies they adopt to ensure compliance in this complex regulatory environment.

Overview of Recent Sales Tax Legislation

The Wayfair decision and its impact on sales tax laws
The Wayfair decision, a 2018 landmark ruling by the US Supreme Court, transformed the landscape of sales tax legislation for ecommerce businesses. This decision enabled states to craft legislation that would enable them to enforce sales tax collection from out-of-state sellers based on economic nexus thresholds. The Wayfair decision overturned the previous physical presence requirement and paved the way for economic nexus laws that determine sales tax obligations based on sales volume or transaction thresholds.
Read More

Written by Monika Miles | Posted in Wayfair Case • Wayfair Decision

South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc. – THE Case

On June 21, 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of overturning its 1992 decision in Quill, which set a standard requiring substantial physical presence before a state could enforce the sales tax collection responsibilities on a seller. In the current case, South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., writing for the Court’s majority, Justice Anthony Kennedy indicated “…the Court concludes that the physical presence rule of Quill is unsound and incorrect. The Court’s decision in Quill Corp v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992), and National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of Ill., 386 U.S. 753 (1967), should be, and now are, overruled.”