State Income Tax Filing Post-Windsor

The United States Supreme Court’s June 2013 ruling in Windsor held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional. The Internal Revenue Service soon thereafter, issued Revenue Ruling 2013-17 holding that a couple married in any jurisdiction allowed to confer marriage status would be considered married even if they live in a state that does not view them as married (that is, it would interpret marriage using a state of celebration approach rather than a state of domicile approach). That makes sense in that otherwise, the federal government would continue to treat some marriages as unequal to others.

So, how do same-sex married couples file their state tax return if they live in a state that doesn’t treat them as married? It depends.

In accordance with Circular 230 Disclosure

Annette Nellen, CPA, Esq., is a professor in and director of San Jose State University’s graduate tax program (MST), teaching courses in tax research, accounting methods, property transactions, state taxation, employment tax, ethics, tax policy, tax reform, and high technology tax issues.

Annette is the immediate past chair of the AICPA Individual Taxation Technical Resource Panel and a current member of the Executive Committee of the Tax Section of the California Bar. Annette is a regular contributor to the AICPA Tax Insider and Corporate Taxation Insider e-newsletters. She is the author of BNA Portfolio #533, Amortization of Intangibles.

Annette has testified before the House Ways & Means Committee, Senate Finance Committee, California Assembly Revenue & Taxation Committee, and tax reform commissions and committees on various aspects of federal and state tax reform.

Prior to joining SJSU, Annette was with Ernst & Young and the IRS.

Twitter LinkedIn 

Subscribe to TaxConnections Blog

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.



1 comment on “State Income Tax Filing Post-Windsor”

Comments are closed.