‘Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied’?

Mike DeBlis

Wighead English jurist William Gladstone, the author of this famous quote, was obviously not a criminal defense lawyer. In many, if not most, cases, delay is a fundamental element of a successful defense, or even the lynchpin of the entire schmear. Over time, memories fade, evidence is lost (or at least becomes more difficult to find and use in court), witnesses relocate, and prosecutors lose interest in the case. All of these developments weigh in favor of criminal defendants.

To paraphrase Gordon Gekko: Delay is good. Delay is right; delay works. So, there were champagne corks popping all along Wall Street and into the uttermost parts of the earth when the IRS announced that it would delay certain FATCA bank withholding requirements until 2019. However, it remains to be seen whether the delay is a legitimate reprieve or just a temporary stay of execution while someone makes a CVS run for more potassium chloride.

The Announcement

The IRS says it delayed certain portions of FATCA to “facilitate an orderly transition for withholding agents and FFIs regarding FATCA compliance and respond to comments regarding how the phase-out of transitional rules may affect information reporting and withholding systems.” In other words, no one really knew what to do, and the Service didn’t want to look heavy-handed, or at least more heavy-handed than it is now.

At its core, FATCA consists of two components: withholding requirements on certain foreign bank account assets and stool-pigeon “inter-governmental agreements” that require foreign governments to report any possibly noncompliant activity. The recently-announced delay addresses both these areas.

To date, 112 jurisdictions have signed FATCA agreements which obligate them to turn over financial information about U.S. accountholders in exchange for preferred status of the Foreign Financial Institutions operating within its borders. While that is a lot of countries, some notable heavy-hitters like Russia, as well as a few local tax havens like Cuba, are conspicuously absent. So, the delay is calculated to get more countries on board.

In terms of the dreaded withholding requirements, the Service will delay the withholding on foreign pass-thru payments, which was slated to begin in 2017, to at least January 1, 2019, or the date the rule is codified in the Federal Register. In a similar vein, the hammer will not fall on noncompliant FFIs until December 31, 2016. During the next calendar year, FFIs that are not covered by an intergovernmental agreement will be labeled “registration incomplete” until they toe the line.

The IRS will also exempt additional accounts by redefining the grandfather clause in Section 1.1471-2(b)(2)(i)(A), and confirms that the next two calendar years are a transitional period for FATCA compliance purposes.

What It Means

As mentioned earlier, it is too soon to tell whether the Service is merely circling the wagons in preparation for a fight or is willing to smoke the metaphorical peace pipe with expats. Much probably depends on the outcome of the 2018 elections.

That being said, there are some indications that the countries who signed FATCA agreements, or at least a portion of them, are starting to have second thoughts. If FATCA does start to unravel, the IRS will have a few options:

• Call it quits and declare victory based on the amount of money already collected and the buzz already created,

• Modify the FATCA agreements in a way that gives signatories a bit more authority over the funds inside their own borders, or

• Damn the torpedoes and full speed ahead.

That first scenario is rather unlikely. As anyone who has ever been audited or investigated will attest, the IRS does not quit. However, there is the real possibility that the Service will back off at least somewhat. The Notice makes several references to the slew of negative comments that the IRS has received.

For now, it’s wait and see. My general advice in these situations is to hope for the best and plan for the worst.

Original Post By:  Michael DeBlis


Michael delivered a wonderful interview at the Internet Tax Summit about the FBAR. If you missed it, you can purchase the entire Internet Tax Summit recordings plus bonus material below.

Recordings And Bonus Material



As a former public defender, Michael has defended the poor, the forgotten, and the damned against a gov. that has seemingly unlimited resources to investigate and prosecute crimes. He has spent the last six years cutting his teeth on some of the most serious felony cases, obtaining favorable results for his clients. He knows what it’s like to go toe to toe with the government. In an adversarial environment that is akin to trench warfare, Michael has developed a reputation as a fearless litigator.

Michael graduated from the Thomas M. Cooley Law School. He then earned his LLM in International Tax. Michael’s unique background in tax law puts him into an elite category of criminal defense attorneys who specialize in criminal tax defense. His extensive trial experience and solid grounding in all major areas of taxation make him uniquely qualified to handle any white-collar case.


One comment

  1. Shovel says:

    “William Gladstone … was obviously not a CRIMINAL defense lawyer. ….these [delay] developments weigh in favor of CRIMINAL defendants.”

    Thus Michael DeBlis frames the situation in typical modern American fashion… with a sweeping generalization implying that U.S. tainted people in other countries living their normal lives according to international norms are “criminals” hoping by delay to evade “justice”.

    The modern American exceptionalist systems of both citizenship-based taxation and expatriation, as applied to long-term residents and citizens of other countries burdened with a clinging U.S. taint, are fundamentally systems of injustice harkening back to Britain of the 18th century.

    It’s staggering to me how Americans like DeBlis can grasp so little of the founding principles of their own country.

    If the blog was true to the United States of America, its slant and title would be “Injustice delayed is justice prolonged”.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ten + 12 =