Texas Deeds And Conditions Subsequent | The Other Reversionary Interest

Assume That Owner A Deeds To Buyer B Real Property In Texas Via A Special Warranty Deed That Contains The Following Provision:

The property shall be used exclusively for XYZ purposes. In the event said property should cease to be used for such XYZ purposes, said property shall become the property of Organization ABC and Organization ABC shall have the right to use and hold said property and dispose of same as Organization ABC may determine.

What happens if Buyer uses the property for other than XYZ purposes?

Can Owner A enforce the use requirement? If so, what process is used to enforce?

If Buyer B sells the property to a third party, can Buyer B’s successor-in-interest use the property for other than XYZ purposes?

Can Organization ABC enforce the provision in the deed if Buyer B or Buyer B’s successor-in-interest use the property for other than XYZ purposes?

So many questions… But, in Texas—a state having over 171 million acres of real property and a 175-plus year history—these types of legal issues and questions are not uncommon.

The hypothetical deed provision noted above is, more likely than not, a type of reversionary interest. Reversionary interests are generally referred to as a “possibility of reverter” or “right of entry”—the latter also known as a “power of termination.” The distinction between the two types of reversionary interests is that a possibility of reverter is said to transfer possession of the property automatically to the holder of the reversionary interest upon satisfaction of a condition, while a right of entry requires some action on behalf of the holder of the interest to take possession of the property after the condition is broken.
Read More

Texas Taxes

[In this very special “throwback” edition of the Texas Tax Round Up, newly reemerged from out the Super-Saragossa Sea of the Internet, we travel back to a much simpler time—February 2022.]

Howdy y’all!  Has it been a month already?  We’ve got another action-packed month of Comptroller-related news.  Here we go!

Court Cases

Courts of Appeals

Hegar v. Black, Mann, and Graham, L.L.P., No. 03-20-00391-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Feb. 25, 2022)

  • The Texas Third Court of Appeals held that a taxpayer may self-assess and pay tax under protest for subsequent periods after the filing of a protest suit and include those periods in the suit by amending the petition— in other words, there’s no requirement that the Comptroller actually assess tax for those periods. Thus, the Court of Appeals upheld that the District Court’s denial of the Comptroller’s plea to the jurisdiction for those subsequent periods.
  • On the merits, however, the Court of Appeals held that the taxpayer—a law firm that specialized in preparing loan packages for lending institutions—purchased taxable data processing (instead of nontaxable legal or paralegal) services from vendors when the vendors created an interface between each lenders’ loan origination systems and the vendors’ document generation systems that produced the loan package, which the law firm then reviewed to ensure the legal requirements were met.

Proposed Rules

Franchise Tax

Read More